OPPO Reno5 Pro+ and Meizu 17 mSmart Comparative Evaluation: Which One Is More Worth Buying?

in News

What is the difference between the OPPO Reno5 Pro+ and Meizu 17 mSmart? In comparison, which one is more worth buying? Today, I will analyze the parameter comparison evaluation of OPPO Reno5Pro+ and Meizu 17 mSmart for everyone. What are the friends who are interested in these two phones waiting? Welcome to 5GPrice for reference.

1.Comparison of main parameters


OPPO Reno5 Pro+ 5G Phone


Meizu 17 mSmart 5G Phone

 Product Code

OPPO Reno5 Pro+ 

Meizu 17 mSmart


 AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1100 nits (peak)

 Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (typ)


 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio)

 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~86.6% screen-to-body ratio)


 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density)

 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density)





 Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+)

 Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 (7 nm+)

 Main Camera

 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", PDAF, OIS

 13 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, optical zoom

 16 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)

 2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)

 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF

 12 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, PDAF

 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm

 5 MP, f/1.9, (macro)

 Selfie Camera

 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm

 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm


 Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable

Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable


 Fast charging 65W

 SuperVOOC 2.0

 Reverse charging

 Fast charging 30W, 45% in 30 min (advertised)

 Quick Charge 3.0


OPPO Reno5 Pro+ is equipped with Snapdragon 865 processor, Snapdragon 865 is built with 7nm process, 8-core CPU, from a large core Kryo 495 (A77 modified) + three core Kryo 495 (A77 modified) + four small core Kryo 495 (A55 modified)

Meizu 17 mSmart is also equipped with a Snapdragon 865 processor, AnTuTu score of 585,616 points, in line with the first-class echelon level of the 5g flagship machine. Specifically, Meizu 17 mSmart has a CPU score of 182287, GPU score of 218386, MEM score of 97586, and UX score of 87357.



OPPO Reno5 Pro+ uses a 6.55-inch AMOLED screen with a single hollow-out design in the upper left corner, a resolution of 2400x1080 pixels, and a maximum refresh rate of 90Hz.

Meizu 17 mSmart adopts 2.99mm micro-hole design and ultra-narrow frame design, supports 120Hz screen refresh rate

4.Take pictures

OPPO Reno5 Pro+ is equipped with a total of five cameras, the imx766 rear main camera is 50mp+16mp ultra-wide-angle+13mp telephoto+2mp macro, and supports FDF full-dimensional portrait video technology, and the front is 32 million pixels.

Meizu 17 mSmart uses full-scene four cameras, the main camera is 64 million pixels, and the sensor is Sony IMX 686

5.Battery life

OPPO Reno5 Pro+ battery capacity is 4500mAh, with 65W super flash charging technology, it can meet the needs of users, let you free yourself and play games.

The Meizu 17 mSmart battery has a capacity of 4500mAh and supports 30W fast charging.



Through the above comparative analysis, I think the OPPO Reno5 Pro+ will have a higher configuration. However, in the process of buying a mobile phone, you still have to make a decision based on your own needs and the characteristics of the mobile phone in order to make the most reasonable choice. To this end, I will give you the following suggestions for purchasing the machine, hoping to help you.

By observing the differences in all aspects of these two phones, the advantages of OPPO Reno5 Pro+ are mainly reflected in multiple aspects such as lighter and thinner, better performance, stronger camera capabilities, and faster charging speed. Also, the appearance of this phone is very stylish and individual, especially the top of the fuselage is equipped with a luminous decoration. So in the process of buying a mobile phone, it will be better to buy OPPO Reno5 Pro+.

If in the process of buying a mobile phone, what you value is the high quality and cost-effectiveness of a mobile phone, I suggest that you buy the Meizu 17 mSmart 5G phone will be more suitable.

0 comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *